![]() ![]() Typical error responses follow a similar structure to successful responses. In this case, it’s safe to assume that the content cannot be found (HTTP 404 means “Not Found”). ![]() For instance, you may occasionally see a HTTP 404 along with a HTML response. In these circumstances where a response structure cannot be parsed, consider the HTTP code’s core meaning to take precedence. Usually a JSON response will be attached, but some errors will respond with different kinds of body. In this case, assume the single hashmap is an object of the same type as specified in the type field.Įrror responses are served with a non-200-series HTTP code. In some rare cases, you may see a response that would typically include a collection with a hashmap instead. It will be returned as JSON hash when only one result is possible in response. The format of the data node will be a JSON array when the response may contain one or more results. ![]() The data field in JSON responses will contain the specific objects associated with the leveraged resource. If you had issued a successful request you would receive as part of your response a request node echoing back your request.Įxample: GET accounts/abcdefg/campaigns?with_deleted=true What's more, I don't experience this problem on an older machine protected by the same solution, which also uses the same Microsoft Office 365 applications, but due to its age, only runs an older version of MacOs, the HighSierra version.Īs cambsGooner mentions below "let's get a fix to this." but I'm a bit afraid due to the fact there is no reaction since the last post of March 8.Successful responses are indicated with a 200-series HTTP code and a JSON-based payload containing the object(s) requested, created, modified, or deleted along with an expression of the server’s interpretation of your request. In the case that is mentioned, and which particularly impacts me for Microsoft Office 365 applications (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Teams, Edge), I have a little difficulty in making the link between a protection system against the risks of malware infection of all types and the invalid signature error unless and that is perhaps if the signature control depends on a connection to an Apple server and that the protection software (firewall) would cause a connection latency not foreseen in the signature control processes. If indeed following the good practices mentioned in your link allows avoiding several infections, there is always a risk. I have seen that Windows does not have a monopoly on malware even though it is the primary infected platform (inevitably when you represent over 90% of the ICT population.). With my deep respect, I have more than 20 years of experience in the field of information security, working with SOC and CSIRT teams, and providing support to clients to ensure compliance and protection of their information within their company. Other than the crashes, the iMAC behaves flawlessly. I've also tried running Disk Utility First Aid / Repair (both direct and in recovery mode), but no errors are reported. I do appreciate you taking the time out to look at this, and in particular for the pointer to EtreCheck, which is a neat bit of software. ![]() I come from an IT development background (25 years experience), so although the information in the link you've provided is sound, it's not news to me and I've followed such good practice on my many machines over the years. I also don't see the interaction between the AV and Code Signing issue in the crash logs, although I'm beginning to think that the specific error thrown is a red herring. I've been using Mac's since 2006, and this is this is the first time I've seen such wide-spread misbehaviour from the OS. I want to reiterate, that this behaviour only commenced after the install of Big Sur. I've been using Intego AV for many years, and it has never had an adverse affect on the Mac as far as I have seen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |